Why do Obama followers keep posting his website as a source for reliable info on their candidate?

Who in their right mind considers a candidate’s own website an objective source for any information? Do they really think that his website is going to give accurate info about either him OR his opponent?
It’s absolutely appalling how ignorant these people are.
Is it any wonder oBAAAmas followers are called sheep?

In this attention deficit democracy, every one who believes his speeches, should be given free meds. Because all change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. We are in for a bumpy ride.

20 Responses to “Why do Obama followers keep posting his website as a source for reliable info on their candidate?”

  1. Because they are all followers and not one is a leader.
    References :

  2. Website is always a good resource

    Go Website!!!!

    Website’08!!!
    References :

  3. Mary_mountain_lover on December 31st, 2009 at 8:57 pm

    Even Bill is endorcing Obama….
    or so it seems. Bill Clinton, 2004:

    "If one candidate is trying to scare you and the other one is try get you to think, if one candidate is appealing to your fears and the other one is appealing to your hopes, you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope."
    References :

  4. hey, y does hilary suck so much?
    References :

  5. Well, when the candidate in question has integrity, it’s easier to trust him. Oh, and you are a tool.
    References :

  6. Because they wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked them in the face.
    References :

  7. when it’s all ya have….
    References :

  8. I’m not an ignorant. I’ve seen Hillary’s followers doing the same…so… There are ignorants in both groups!!! You can’t generalize, the same way you can’t say that all Latinos are voting for Hillary, because I’m a Latina for Obama!!!
    References :

  9. Because they are brainwashed and can not think for themselves.
    References :

  10. It’s all they have. I’m hoping Obama beats Hillary, because the republicans will be able to dismantle Obama easily.
    References :

  11. Ok so maybe Foxnews is a more objective site for a candidate’s official info?

    Trust my enemies, my friends are biased?
    References :

  12. information_police on January 1st, 2010 at 1:01 am

    They assume that people on a message board can read.

    But, I’m amazed that you think that a candidate is a bad source of information on what their own positions are.
    References :

  13. Why not? I doubt anyone has any objectivity anymore. At least with the candidate’s website, I’ll know which direction the spin will be going.
    References :

  14. When the question is along the lines of "what is Obama’s position on X", his issue statements on his campaign website are the most definitive source.
    References :

  15. If you ever bothered to actually READ what is on his website you might think otherwise.
    References :

  16. In this attention deficit democracy, every one who believes his speeches, should be given free meds. Because all change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. We are in for a bumpy ride.
    References :

  17. Because they follow him like sheep.
    References :

  18. Some people care about what a candidate says in addition to what’s being said about him or her.

    That’s not ignorance, it’s interest. If we read opinions and statements of people in the media, why shouldn’t we read the opinions and statements of the candidates?

    Candidates’ sites might not be objective, but they are a reliable source of what the candidates say.
    References :

  19. BRAINWASHED MOONBATS!!!!!
    References :

  20. That is how they are programmed.
    References :

Leave a Reply