Who in their right mind considers a candidate’s own website an objective source for any information? Do they really think that his website is going to give accurate info about either him OR his opponent?
It’s absolutely appalling how ignorant these people are.
Is it any wonder oBAAAmas followers are called sheep?
In this attention deficit democracy, every one who believes his speeches, should be given free meds. Because all change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. We are in for a bumpy ride.
December 31st, 2009 at 7:35 pm
Because they are all followers and not one is a leader.
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 8:24 pm
Website is always a good resource
Go Website!!!!
Website’08!!!
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 8:57 pm
Even Bill is endorcing Obama….
or so it seems. Bill Clinton, 2004:
"If one candidate is trying to scare you and the other one is try get you to think, if one candidate is appealing to your fears and the other one is appealing to your hopes, you better vote for the person who wants you to think and hope."
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 9:05 pm
hey, y does hilary suck so much?
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Well, when the candidate in question has integrity, it’s easier to trust him. Oh, and you are a tool.
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 9:57 pm
Because they wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked them in the face.
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 10:35 pm
when it’s all ya have….
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 11:13 pm
I’m not an ignorant. I’ve seen Hillary’s followers doing the same…so… There are ignorants in both groups!!! You can’t generalize, the same way you can’t say that all Latinos are voting for Hillary, because I’m a Latina for Obama!!!
References :
December 31st, 2009 at 11:26 pm
Because they are brainwashed and can not think for themselves.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 12:13 am
It’s all they have. I’m hoping Obama beats Hillary, because the republicans will be able to dismantle Obama easily.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 12:48 am
Ok so maybe Foxnews is a more objective site for a candidate’s official info?
Trust my enemies, my friends are biased?
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 1:01 am
They assume that people on a message board can read.
But, I’m amazed that you think that a candidate is a bad source of information on what their own positions are.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 1:08 am
Why not? I doubt anyone has any objectivity anymore. At least with the candidate’s website, I’ll know which direction the spin will be going.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 1:21 am
When the question is along the lines of "what is Obama’s position on X", his issue statements on his campaign website are the most definitive source.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 1:27 am
If you ever bothered to actually READ what is on his website you might think otherwise.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 2:07 am
In this attention deficit democracy, every one who believes his speeches, should be given free meds. Because all change is not growth, as all movement is not forward. We are in for a bumpy ride.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 2:39 am
Because they follow him like sheep.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 3:08 am
Some people care about what a candidate says in addition to what’s being said about him or her.
That’s not ignorance, it’s interest. If we read opinions and statements of people in the media, why shouldn’t we read the opinions and statements of the candidates?
Candidates’ sites might not be objective, but they are a reliable source of what the candidates say.
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 3:55 am
BRAINWASHED MOONBATS!!!!!
References :
January 1st, 2010 at 4:21 am
That is how they are programmed.
References :